Sunday, 17 May 2020

Knowledge Nuggets – Part 5 - Data Collection – Measure Phase

I have covered Project Charter - in my previous post Knowledge Nuggets - part 3.

The next step during the Measure phase is the data collection. I want to share some of the interesting and critical points during data collection.
Data filtering or screening:
  • Important step before you work on the data analysis is to do the data screening to check the validity of the data. May be data entry error, intentional data tweaking, lack of understanding of data definition. Hence start with operational definition of the data.
  • If the data is not accurate and you will draw wrong / erroneous conclusions about the process behavior.
Data needs to representative of the process. what is representative? Sample data set need to capture all the factors contributing to variations in the process. This is important to study the process behavior accurately.
  • For example, if you collect data to study the height of Indian population you can’t select data only from south or north. Since the height of the population varies significantly from North to Southern part of India.
Data segmentation:
  • Segmentation is important to study the process behavior. You can’t mix two different things in one data set. This will hide the process behavior.
    • For example,
      • Shift operations
      • Regions
      • Machines
      • Raw material
      • Vendors and so on.
Practical aspects of Measure Phase data collection to consider:
  • Few challenges one may face during the Measure Phase especially in the case of Service Industry:
    • Existing measures may not be available
    • No data capturing system in place
    • People don’t want to capture as in the case of “error” between the maker and checker. They rectify the error and never track to find out why and what kind of errors are occurring.
This will delay the project progress to proceed further within the time plan if above things are not addressed.
  • The end in mind for Measure phase is to establish Baseline Process Capability.
    • For service industry the best method for establishing process capability is to adopt simple DPMO method according to me.
    • As service processes, in many cases, not fitting in any of the known Statistical Distribution properly.
    •  No need to get stuck to find what distribution your process fits in, which is unnecessary according to me. More specifically it will never fit in the principles of normal distribution.
    • Aim is to improve the process not to get stuck Statistics.

  • When there is no reasonable data available?
    • Worst case you will not have enough data to establish process capability. The team should not get stuck at this stage and invest time to establish base line. Since you have enough sense of the problem please move on to the next phase. Nothing wrong.
    • Simple saying, we have no data we can’t use DMAIC is not an excuse. This way you will get away with not resolving the problem.
    • Also, as part of the measure phase, it is a good chance to define, test, validate and establish the new data collection system.
Let me conclude the post with the following comments given by Mr. Mikel Harry on my blog " DMAIC" some time back. Well-articulated about the data collection.

cid:image002.png@01CF55A0.3E31C090

I will cover in my next post on the following topics Normal distribution, Process Capability and 6 & Sigma explanation.

Performance Management System

Would you drive a car without a dashboard? Absolutely not right? 

Before I get in to the details of Performance Management System. Let me take an example of  a car to drive home the point.

Car is a good example of having indicators / warnings both lead and lag indicators. Rather car has lot of lead indicators.
  • Visual and audible warnings when fuel is low
  • Warning indicators covering all directions
  • Service due indicator
  • Speed limit indicator and lot more..  
All the above said and unsaid indicators are critical for driving car safely.
When we have so many indicators for a car, can anyone imagine running an organization without any indicator. Disaster isn’t it?
As a Six Sigma practitioner I can’t think of any process where you don’t have a measure.  Afterall what gets measured gets improved.
Performance management using Key Performance Indicators is critical for any organization not only to move forward but also in the right direction.
Ink Drawings
Ink Drawings
Ink Drawings
Ink Drawings
Ink Drawings
Ink Drawings
Ink Drawings
Ink Drawings
Ink Drawings
Ink Drawings
Ink Drawings
Ink Drawings
Ink Drawings
Ink Drawings
Ink Drawings
Ink Drawings
Ink Drawings
Ink Drawings
Ink Drawings
Ink Drawings
Ink Drawings
Ink Drawings
Ink Drawings
Ink Drawings
Ink Drawings
Ink Drawings
Ink Drawings
Ink Drawings
Ink Drawings
Ink Drawings
Ink Drawings




The following are the reasons for the above scenario:
  • Poorly understood kpis
  • Isolated / islands of departments and their priorities
  • No strategic direction
  • Improper drill down of organizational strategy
  • Lack of communication of organizational strategy
  • Lack of top management involvement in setting the organizational strategy and drill down
I will cover the following in my next post:
  • What is meant by KPI
  • Lead and Lag indicators
  • Pitfalls of Goal / KPIs setting
  • Few industries specific example of Goal deployment – a case study

Knowledge Nuggets - Part 4 - Product Development in Service Sector

Product development is generally a weak area for Service Sector in the whole value chain with exception of few businesses value chain unlike in manufacturing sector. Service sectors give lot of importance in execution / delivery than focusing on the Product Development.
This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is product-2.png

The following are some of the Challenges / Weaknesses in Product Development in Service / Transactional Sector:
  1. Lack of product development structure
  2. Lack of Product development life cycle process
  3. Lack of skill sets within the organization
  4. Little or no information about the Customer touch points, pain areas and linkage with internal processes/ systems
  5. Service product designer not having enough visibility or clarity of processes which deliver the product / service to the customer post product launch.
  6. Lack of product innovation in delivering value to the customer
  7. Lack of digitization in the customer offerings (except few sectors like banking, insurance etc.,)
  8.  No or little clarity on the stages of product development
  9. Lack of engagement with internal stake holders (especially the internal stake holders) and their requirements affecting the product
  10. Finally, Lack of clarity between What is a Process?  and What is a Product?  Itself.  
There can be many and finer list of challenges / weaknesses in service sector one may wish to add. I have listed the above challenges based on my experience and exposure to process design both in Service and Manufacturing Sectors. Certainly, the challenges are very different in the service sector.
In my next post I wish to share the best practice in product development process.

Please leave your comment and experience in the comments section for the benefit of readers and learning from your experience